AICPA SOC 2 Type II compliance logo for the ReactorCX platform by Loyalty Methods

ReactorCX completes its SOC 2® Audit! Security is our Top Priority.

SOC 2 Type II
Compliance Report

Security, availability, and confidentiality - independently audited to meet enterprise data protection standards.

SOC 2 Certified
Certified Loyalty Methods
SOC 2 Type II
Security Availability Confidentiality
View full report
Platform Comparison

Loyalty Methods vs Salesforce Loyalty Management

Built for the program you already run

ReactorCX is an enterprise loyalty engine for programs that already exist at scale. Members, balances, tiers, and history move over intact, promotions resolve against one ledger at the register, and the platform integrates into the stack you run today rather than replacing it. It is built for enterprises replatforming live multi-brand programs, where the migration is the real risk in the decision.

Jump to the full comparison ↓
RCX Nexus Admin Console overview dashboard, showing program performance KPIs, point liability, and enrollment trends in one unified view

Trusted by

7-Eleven
Gap Inc.
MGM Resorts
BP
Western Union
Athleta

Where ReactorCX is built differently

Each difference below is documented on Loyalty Methods' public pages and linked at its source.

A migration you can verify before you switch

Replatforming a live program fails when balances and history have to be rebuilt by hand. ThreadSync™ builds and validates the program as parallel workstreams while the current platform keeps serving members. SafeSwitch™ then runs production traffic against both systems, reconciles them until they match, and completes the cutover once parity holds, with rollback in place. Every ReactorCX migration to date has run with zero downtime.

Parity first cutover happens after the systems reconcile

Offers decided against the ledger in real time

A single checkout can qualify for a dozen overlapping offers, and something has to decide which of them apply. The ReactorCX engine evaluates every valid combination and returns the optimal allocation in sub-second time, under customer-first, business-first, or vendor-protected arbitration policies. Earn and discount resolve in one call, so the register receives one answer. Program teams validate rule changes in a stage environment with program versioning before anything reaches production.

Sub-second optimal allocation across overlapping offers
Program flow diagram: Program Entry starts at Init Program, then Load Member Data, which branches into Partner Activity Check and Personalization Rules, each showing member-count metrics and a short description. START Program Entry Init Program 22.7K Initialize member context & defaults Load Member Data 22.7K Fetch profile, tier, balances & status Partner Activity Check 22.7K 4.2K 18.5K Completed partner activity? Personalization Rules 22.7K 3.2K 19.5K Tailor experience by member segment

One member record across every brand

Multi-brand programs strain when each banner keeps its own member database. ReactorCX runs multiple currency types and point purses per brand as sub-balances inside one member wallet, and resolves mixed baskets at the line item for brand-level accounting. Gap Inc. runs Encore this way across Old Navy, Gap, Banana Republic, and Athleta, with each brand keeping its own earning rules and books.

One balance four Gap Inc. brands earn and redeem on Encore

Compare Loyalty Methods vs Salesforce Loyalty Management on what matters

Marks reflect what each vendor publicly documents as of the publish date.

Publicly documented Blank: not publicly documented
CapabilityLoyalty Methods (ReactorCX)Salesforce Loyalty Management
Core loyalty model
Multi-currency purses and sub-balances per member
Tier structures
Multiple loyalty programs on one platform
Line-item accruals on one basket attributed to the brand that earned them, liability reported per brandNot publicly documented
Promotions and incentives
Real-time offer decisioning at checkout
Promotion testing before production release
Optimal allocation across overlapping offers under customer-first, business-first, or vendor-protected policiesNot publicly documented
Finance and reporting
Loyalty liability reporting
Partner settlement reconciled against partner-reported volumeNot publicly documented
Integration and governance
API-first architecture with published APIs
Runs on your existing stack with no underlying platform edition requirementNot publicly documented
Audit logging and role-based access controls
Marketing automation and customer data platform in the same suite as the loyalty engineNot publicly documented
Migration
Parallel run on cloned production traffic with transaction-level parity before cutoverNot publicly documented
Balances and tier status reconciled against the legacy platform before cutoverNot publicly documented
Publicly documented Blank: not publicly documented

Recognition and certifications

Named enterprise customers carry the proof: 7-Eleven, Gap Inc., MGM Resorts, BP, Western Union, and Athleta.

Forrester
Recognized in The Forrester Loyalty Platforms Landscape, Q3 2025 — read the announcement

See what your migration looks like before you commit

Bring your current program map, and the Loyalty Methods team will walk through how your members, balances, tiers, and history would move onto ReactorCX, and what parity looks like before cutover.

Loyalty Methods vs Salesforce Loyalty Management FAQs

How do we migrate from Salesforce Loyalty Management to ReactorCX?
Loyalty Methods publishes its migration method rather than leaving cutover to a data import. ThreadSync™ builds and validates the program as parallel workstreams while your current platform keeps serving members. SafeSwitch™ then runs production traffic against both systems, reconciles them until they match, and completes the cutover once parity holds, with rollback in place.
What happens to member point balances and tier status during a migration?
Migration is judged against full production parity rather than a one-time file import. The new platform processes the same qualifying transactions as the old one, in shadow, so balances, tier status, and member state reconcile between systems before any member moves.
Does ReactorCX integrate with Salesforce products like Marketing Cloud?
Yes. ReactorCX is headless, API-first, and event-driven, and Loyalty Methods describes it as integrating into an existing enterprise stack rather than replacing it. Salesforce Marketing Cloud appears as an integration in Loyalty Methods' own industry architectures, so loyalty events can flow to the campaign tools your marketing team already runs. Choosing ReactorCX is a loyalty engine decision, and your Salesforce estate stays in place.
What does Loyalty Methods do differently than Salesforce Loyalty Management?
Both platforms run loyalty in real time, and both report program liability; ReactorCX also reports lineage, where every liability figure traces to an originating member activity and partner settlement comes out of the same ledger. The difference buyers weigh most is the starting point. Salesforce Loyalty Management runs on the Salesforce Platform and fits teams building there; ReactorCX is built for replatforming live programs, with a published cutover method that reconciles the new system against production before any member moves.

What teams say about working with Loyalty Methods

BP logo

Loyalty Methods has been a crucial partner, providing a flexible platform and bringing an experienced team that has partnered well with BP to deliver on our initiatives with excellence and dedication.

Tarang Sethia
Chief Product Officer & GM,
Digital Products, Mobility & Convenience, Americas, BP
7-Eleven logo

They are experts in their space and provide excellent solutions, creativity and out of the box thinking.

Steve Kinch
Innovation Leader,
7-Eleven
View case study
Western Union logo

LM’s focus on innovation, agility, and successful, seamless delivery has made a massive difference in our efforts.

Lucy Donaldson
Head Loyalty,
Martech & Consumer Ecosystems, Western Union
View case study
Gap Inc. logo

[Marketing teams] need to be able to move without engaging your engineering orgs … You've missed the moment completely, if you can't do that.

Kevin Meiners
Head of Loyalty and Payments,
Gap Inc.
View case study

Still comparing?

A short conversation with the Loyalty Methods team will show you how your program's members, currencies, and partners would sit on one ledger.

Contact Us